https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1830
--- Comment #29 from Matthew Vernon <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Philip Hazel from comment #28) > (In reply to Matthew Vernon from comment #24) > > (In reply to Philip Hazel from comment #20) > > > > > PCRE2POSIX_EXP_DECL int pcre2_regcomp(regex_t *, const char *, int); > > > PCRE2POSIX_EXP_DECL int regcomp(regex_t *, const char *, int); > > > > For reference, the Debian packaging uses the rather infelicitous > > PCRE2regcomp (et al), and will probably have to continue doing so > > indefinitely. > > Would it be helpful if pcre2posix.h also defined your names as macros for > pcre2_regcomp() etc? I don't think I mind doing this. Yes, that would be very helpful indeed :) (I'd like to carry as small a diff against upstream as I can in Debian, and your doing this would obviously help that). Thanks, Matthew -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
