On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, ND via Pcre-dev wrote: > It may be less unusial if we use a simple assertions:
That is probably what most people do. > I agree that max lookbehind value corresponds to docs. > But this is not an end in itself. We keep in mind that max lookbehind value > calculation intended for multisegment matching. I woke up in the middle of last night with an idea as to how it could easily be made better, but I haven't looked at the code yet. I am busy with other things today and tomorrow, but then I will see if my midnight bright idea actually works. > This means that calculation of max lookbehind must be corrected to provide the > ability to do proper multisegment matching. Yes, I fully understand! Philip -- Philip Hazel -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
