https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2575
--- Comment #4 from Billy Donahue <[email protected]> --- Thanks, Giuseppe. That's a good point. I assumed without looking that the RE_Options was expensive to construct. Otherwise why would this optimization be there in the first place? But yeah, it's just 3 value-initialized ints. There are no other data members. RE_Options() : match_limit_(0), match_limit_recursion_(0), all_options_(0) {} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
