I went ahead and installed windows again anyway after
reformatting again using the SU disk, same thing!!  STILL
cannot run scandisk!
-Clint

----- Original Message -----
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Clint Hamilton"


I've use the floppy before with no problems.  It is NOT the
new one that has all that garbage on it that screws a HD up
(it's v9.09).

Well Greg, I used the windows SU disk to format the HD this
time and it STILL is showing 4096k cluster sizes!

>>>From your other reply:
Use chkdsk, to determine cluster size ...
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca/tips.htm#scandisk

I did that, and it shows the cluster size ("allocation
units") @ 4096K!  So, I don't get it.  Why does Sandra Pro
state 16k????

I will reformat again using the windows SU disk as it
suggests and see what that does.  I can't understand though
why I have never seen this problem before on 15gb, 18gb, 20gb
>>>or 45gb drives.

What now?  :-)  Why am I having this problem now?  I NEVER
have before with large HD's.  How do I change the cluster
size to 16k? (If this is the consensus as to what is causing
the problem).
-Clint

God Bless Us All
Clint Hamilton, Owner
http://OrpheusComputing.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Kaulback" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Have you tried the WD install disk with other drives, perhaps
it is
corrupted. I try not to use vendor setup disc's anymore, too
many errors found.

Peter Kaulback

In the hour of 08:17 AM 4/14/2002 -0500,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Clint Hamilton spoke this:

>the problem since it's set to 16k and no 3rd party software
>was used. ?  According to the other text on that page, 16k
is
>correct for a 17.2gb drive:
>
>    Hard disk size     Cluster size
>    -------------------------------
>    16 GB and larger   16 KB
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================

Reply via email to