On Nov 12, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 10:01 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hmm, never seen that. I just got the "pd" process. Which platform
are you on?
did you ever have a look at m_pd.h?
Any reason for this snide comment? Of course I've seen those
functions, but never in the context of connecting gdb to the pd process.
How about saying something productive instead?
.hc
.hc
On Nov 11, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Conor J Curran wrote:
Hi,
Tonight I was trying to hook up GDB with PD. When attempting to
attach
to PD, I was presented with the following options. Could anyone
tell me
which process/es should I connect to?
pd_bang pd_free
pd_setloadingabstraction
pd_bind [EMAIL PROTECTED] pd_symbol
pd_canvasmaker pd_getparentwidget pd_typedmess
pd_checkobject pd_init [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pd_compiledate pd_list pd_unbind
pd_compiletime pd_new pd_version
pd_doloadbang [EMAIL PROTECTED] pd_vmess
pd_error pd_newest pdfloat_setup
pd_fft pd_objectmaker pdint_setup
pd_findbyclass pd_pointer pdsymbol_setup
pd_float pd_popsym
pd_forwardmess pd_pushsym
it's not a list of processes, but a list of symbols ...
hth, tim
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 96771783
http://www.mokabar.tk
All we composers really have to work with is time and sound - and
sometimes I'm not even sure about sound.
Morton Feldman
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Access to computers should be unlimited and total. - the hacker ethic
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
PD-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
