On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Alexandre Quessy wrote:
I think a t_pointer * is a must in a mature dataflow software. Let's
face it : it is sometimes necessary.
You seem to like to face things. Now face this: pd-dev is not the right
place for discussing pd development issues!
I made the same request (actually, a better one, involving custom atom
types) for Pd 0.35 (in August 2002 on pd-list) and the response has been
close to none. I reiterated in 0.38 times (during 2005) when I got Miller
on IRC and basically from that point I knew that it wouldn't be possible
through Miller.
(I will tell you more about this when we get to see each other next week.)
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
