On 13/09/2007, at 17.05, Chris McCormick wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:08:27PM +0200, Steffen wrote: >> >> On 12/09/2007, at 20.50, Frank Barknecht wrote: >> >>> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >>> >>>> personally i think "externals" is exactly the name (snip) >>> >>> How about "extensions"? (snip) >> >> By the best of intentions -- I think that's a nice 'bike shed' >> colour. > > I am not sure I understand what you mean by this Steffen (snip)
I'm sorry that i was not clear. I mean first of all, that extensions is a ok with me. I before stated (agreed with Mathieu) that it would be nice if the union of parts was not named the same as one of the parts. Secondly -- this is were the best of intentions and 'bike shed' comes in -- i meant to (indirectly) expressed a concern wrt. the discussion about the transition, as it reminds me of the 'bike shed colour' story. I would like to underline the 'best of intentions' part! Best, Steffen _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev