On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 15:20 +0200, Steffen Juul wrote: > On Mon, June 23, 2008 2:31 pm, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > i would like to be able to > > check out as much as possible from the same repository. i think, that is > > also the main goal of pd-svn, isn't it? > > I cann't answer that question, which relate very mush to the thread > "svn:externals, pd-extended, SVN and the goal of it all", as such. But > just state that i totally support people in maintaining their software > where they think it makes sense or feel comfy. As an example, GEM is not > in the SF-Pd repo either. > > Releasing and distributing software is a different matter. Wherever it is > in a hub, has some package manager support, supports a "defined" format > for distribution or not. > > The only thing i wish for, as a user, is some sort of version number per > release. I know some people thinks the increasing revision number provided > by, in this case, the SF-SVN-Pd repo works as version numbering. I think > that it doesn't due to fragmented state of the repo. I admit it would work > as some sort of version numbering if, say, list-abs, had it's own, say, > SF-SVN repo. > > But if you don't at the same time want to flush QA down the plug hole, > you'd need to develop the software some where else till it has become > mature/ready for a new release. In which case your using the first > mentioned repo as a publishing tool, and not for reversion control. > > Just my two bit. - I hope i don't provoke anyone, just cause some thought.
yo.. steffen.. i think, it makes totally sense, what you say. thanks for your two bits. roman ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev