Hi, Thomas.
Did not quite catch up on weather you meant that the PortMidi libraries should work as is, or needs a simple patch applied. In any case, yes, I do have the interest.. and time, perhaps I can manage. Is this literally a patch to be applied to the source? I do mainly work on pd-extended, and building either distros, I have not been very successful under windows. I am certainly sure I will learn something from it. -- David Shimamoto > Hi David, > the devel_0_39 branch of pure data completely relies on PortMidi for all > platforms. > We (the vibrez team) found that to work perfectly also for sysex, > realtime etc. messages under Windows. > It's fairly easy to provide a patch for vanilla PD, provided one has got > time and interest. > > gr~~~ > > Am 26.06.2008 um 08:35 schrieb PSPunch: > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> I understand that MIDI objects under Windows is said to be less stable >> than Linux, due to the MIDI functions under Windows API that Pd relies >> on. >> >> If I were to write my own MIDI I/O external for Windows, are there such >> things as alternative MIDI libraries or APIs available, or does Windows >> not allow you to access MIDI devices it recognizes without running data >> through its interface? >> >> Like some posts I made about a month back, my initial goal is to get raw >> MIDI in&out working, this time on Windows. >> >> Any hints appreciated. >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> David Shimamoto >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-dev mailing list >> Pd-dev@iem.at >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >> > > > > Thomas Grill > http://grrrr.org > > _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev