On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Roman Haefeli wrote:
Pd way, instead I came with the idea that [moses] was not enough and
that if [sel] and [route] and such, take multiple number of arguments,
[moses] should. In some patches I had to string 8 [moses] together.
btw such "range" is very feasible with only pd language and dynamic
patching.
see attached patch ;-)
1. if you create a patch using your [range] abstraction, then
connections from the outlets are cut next time you load the patch. this
because you cannot create outlets dynamically early enough without
something like an [initbang], that is executed even before [loadbang]
Actually, I just found a hack. Edit your .pd file with a text editor in
this way:
1. replace "loadbang;" by "r \$0-initbang;"
2. add a line at the very end that says just "$0-initbang bang;", no
backslash, no "#X obj", no object position.
This works in all versions of Pd. If you don't understand how this works,
it's normal. Furthermore, to edit this patch, -noloadbang does not work
anymore, so you have to undo step 2 before any edit in pd, and redo it
after any edit in pd.
So, yes, it can be done in Pd ! But my main point was that it's usually
much less trouble to write the damn thing in C.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
