On Jan 25, 2009, at 7:20 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > >> On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >>> On Jan 23, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: >>>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >>>>> Since the svnnotify script includes direct links to the changed >>>>> code, and more, would anyone object if the commit emails no >>>>> longer include the diff? I think I initially objected to this, >>>>> now I have seen the error of my ways. :D >>>> So, what's the error of your ways? >>> It was just a joke, I mean that I have come around to others' way >>> of thinking on this. >> >> My question is: what are the reasons for not putting the diff >> inside of the email? >> >> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... >> | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec > > > The emails get quite large, like 260k+ per email and they are not > very easy to navigate. The web svn has a lot more info, so I think > that it is more useful to get to the web site as soon as possible to > get info. > > .hc
Ok, it seems there were no objections, so I change it so that the diffs are no longer included in the emails to pd-cvs. Let me know if anyone wants it back, it is easy to change. .hc ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "[W]e have invented the technology to eliminate scarcity, but we are deliberately throwing it away to benefit those who profit from scarcity." -John Gilmore _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
