IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Martin Peach wrote: >> I guess it never occurred to any of you to use objects with different >> names... >> >> Or else why not just call every pd object "object" and then use paths >> to access them, like [pd/some/library/subdirectory/object]? >> >> Just kidding in a frustrated sort of way. >> > > i don't get you point. > > why it might seem questionable to want to override a given function with > a supposedly better one, i don't see why i should bully anyone who wants > to do that... >
Well isn't it just easier to use something with a different name? If you have a backwards [pow] why not just call it [backwardspow] instead of letting users guess which [pow] is the right one? Martin _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
