Hallo, Martin Peach hat gesagt: // Martin Peach wrote: > Well isn't it just easier to use something with a different name? If you > have a backwards [pow] why not just call it [backwardspow] instead of > letting users guess which [pow] is the right one?
If a former external becomes a builtin in some future Pd version, you cannot use something with a different name, you can only rename the old external to something else. And what if the new builtin name was used by different, conflicting classes? What if Pd gets a [counter] builtin as is sometimes requested? Ciao -- Frank Barknecht Do You RjDj.me? _ ______footils.org__ _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
