On May 12, 2009, at 5:19 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The occasional >1meg emails from big commits are kind of a pain,
like when doing an import or merge. It was nice to have immediate
access to scan the diffs for sure. But the web interface to the
diffs is a lot more useful. Ideally, there would be a size cutoff
for the diffs, like 50k or something.
If you really want it, I can deal with it again...
no problem, i can deal with it as well :-)
as for the sizes: i guess i have pointed out in an earlier mail,
that i personally think, that source-files should not contain
(excessive) data. e.g. HRTFs (this was the main reason, wasn't it?)
are _much_ better stored in soundfiles than in header-files.
inappropriate use should not keep use from having features.
If I import code into the 'sources' tree (for Windows), then all of
that code will be sent to pd-cvs. I think the same goes for a merge.
That's a lot of email.
.hc
as for the pain: no one is obliged to subscribing to pd-cvs. those
who want to stay up-to-date on a short notice, can use IRC for that
(i guess there are some filtering options, where you can tell your
client to just display the cia-bot messages)
finally, if you opt to receive pd-cvs in non-digest mode, you can
select whether you want to receive emails of all topics, or only of
topic "autobuild" or only of topic "CVS".
since i don't know of anybody using this feature (iirc, it was a
feature request by tim), i don't know whether it actually works, so
take care :-)
fmga,.sdr
IOhannes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can't steal a gift. Bird gave the world his music, and if you can
hear it, you can have it. - Dizzy Gillespie
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
