Each branch has its own goals and tracks trunk accordingly. Pd- extended tracks trunk with a merge before each release. The pd-devel 0.41.4 branch is currently only for the GUI rewrite effort and is frozen on 0.41.4. Previous pd-devel branches were for other things. Donno about desiredata or other branches.

.hc


On Aug 13, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Tim Jones wrote:

Ok. And all "core versions" are still derivatives of the SVN trunk,
right? Is pd-devel just supposed to be a more stable version of what's
in trunk?

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner<h...@at.or.at> wrote:

There are different core versions of pd: vanilla (miller's), devel,
extended, desiredata. Then there are all of the externals, docs, etc. Pd-extended includes all this stuff as part of each release so everything is then added to the pd-extended release branch. The externals, docs, etc. in the Pd-extended release branch then gets tweaks to make sure it all works
well together as a package.
So if you want the whole tested, integrated Pd-extended package, you should
use everything from the Pd-extended release branches.
.hc
On Aug 12, 2009, at 8:04 PM, Tim Jones wrote:

As the Gentoo pd-overlay is a little moldy, I was planning on fixing some up some of the ebuilds. I was a little bit confused by all the overlap in svn, though. What's the difference between the trunk and the pd-devel branch? pd-overlay also seemingly offers two choices: build pd-extended (with all its externals) in one process, or build pd-devel (or a numbered version of pd, src from M. Puckette's site) and then build the plugins seperately, one
by one. Would there be any significant difference between these two
approaches? I like the modularity of the latter, having seperate ebuilds for each plugin. Also, what would be the best place in svn to get src for the
externals themselves? /trunk/externals?

_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally for
machines to execute.
 - from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs






----------------------------------------------------------------------------

'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink- collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf



_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to