On Oct 31, 2009, at 3:03 PM, András Murányi wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 5:13 PM, olsen
<sesselastron...@googlemail.com> wrote:
buenas
ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
/usr/lib/pd/extra/pidip/pidip.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd/extra/pidip/
pidip.pd_linux: undefined symbol: quicktime_has_video
pidip: can't load library
it's been a long time i haven't seen this one
this means that you load pidip before loading pdp,
or you don't load pdp at all
i guess this was because my brain was building this trunken package
as hans indicated.
so now i'm trying to follow the instructions on build & whoop:
gcc -DPD -Wall -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused -Wno-parentheses -
Wno-switch -fPIC -O2 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math
-DPDP_VERSION=\"0.12.5-darcs\" -I. -I/usr/X11R6/include -I../
include -I../../include -I/home/olsen/pd/pd-extended_2/pd-extended/
pd/src -o pdp_bitmap.o -c pdp_bitmap.c
pdp_bitmap.c:41: error: conflicting types for
‘pdp_packet_bitmap_isvalid’
../../include/pdp_bitmap.h:90: note: previous declaration of
‘pdp_packet_bitmap_isvalid’ was here
make[5]: *** [pdp_bitmap.o] Error 1
any bughunter knows this one?
salutis
ø
I'm standing at the same one (on amd64).
Andras
There was a mismatch between the header declaration, which used a
'bool' return type and the actual functions themselves, which used an
'int' return type. Previously this didn't matter since there was a
#define bool int, which means that all the 'bool's where converted to
'int's before compilation.
Now, its the way it should be. 'svn up' and try again.
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Free software means you control what your computer does. Non-free
software means someone else controls that, and to some extent controls
you." - Richard M. Stallman
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
