> In any case, the deepest meaning of &x->x_obj.te_gobj.g_pd as it could > be > documented is: > > /* I should have learned C++ */
Except that you would also arguably lose on efficiency, particularly when it comes to encapsulation that Pd is designed around... Still, one could re-title these to something more readable without affecting efficiency and/or requiring moving away from C and that would go a long way towards improving legibility, e.g. all_present_objects.cords.visible. > Why hope?... "Rewrite" is just another name for not rewriting, "GUI" is > just another name for less than half of the GUI, and hope is all too often > a disease that makes one stand still. So is 40 hours used for a task that should've taken a fraction of that... Ico _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
