Bugs item #1560895, was opened at 2006-09-18 19:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=1560895&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: IOhannes m zmlnig (zmoelnig) Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Summary: [value] and [send]/[receive] share the same name Initial Comment: [value] and [s] don't like if they are used with the same name. e.g. the following will output "[value]: no method for bang" [bang( | [s bla] [value bla] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: IOhannes m zmlnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2010-02-06 13:39 Message: and just to cover more cases: it's perfectly allowed to use the same name for [catch~]/[throw~] and [send~]/[receive~]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: IOhannes m zmlnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2010-02-06 13:37 Message: as reported by jonathan wilkes (#2946990 ), this also effects [catch~]/[throw~] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2946990&group_id=55736&atid=478070 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mathieu Bouchard (matju) Date: 2006-09-21 19:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=801174 To me it's normal that [r] and [value] share the same symbol-table using exactly the same field (s_thing). Why should it be different? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=1560895&group_id=55736 _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev