2011/10/6 Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]> > > On Oct 6, 2011, at 12:19 PM, András Murányi wrote: > > >> >>>> Do you have access to an ARM >>>> machine? If not, I could probably get one online with ssh access, if >>>> that's >>>> useful. >>>> >>>> I've mailed Joe White with the question if he can patch the code for >>>> libpd and check performance on ARM. He has done some extremely popular >>>> RjDj apps and needed to optimize for them as well. Think it would be >>>> good anyway to keep in touch with libpd users and app programmers >>>> about this topic, even though we're in an early stage with it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes definitely, we should let everyone who wants to be get involved. I >>>> am just saying with need a development platform to start with. Once that's >>>> nailed down, we can deal with more issues, like porting to libpd, dealing >>>> with externals that could be either 32-bit or 64-bit, etc. >>>> >>>> I setup a nightly build on the macosx106-x86_64 and called it pd-double. >>>> Andras and r33p, if you are listening, could you run this build on your >>>> 64-bit boxes also? All you need to do is: >>>> >>>> ~pd/auto-build >>>> cp -a pd-extended pd-double >>>> >>>> >>>> Listening now. >>>> I did: >>>> $ cd ~pd/auto-build >>>> $ sudo cp -a pd-extended pd-double >>>> What's next? Shall I try patching or rather pull IOhannes's sources? >>>> >>> >>> >>> If you have the run-automated-builder script in a cron job, that is all >>> you have to do. >>> >>> .hc >>> >>> >>> Ah, so tomorrow a single and double precision build will automatically be >>> made? Cool. >>> >>> Also, as I was busy with my life (buying a flat) these days, and I >>> couldn't follow the list as precisely as I wished, could you advise me >>> what's the current best way to roll my own double precision pd? Because I >>> would like to benchmark a fully optimised one. >>> >> >> >> That would great to have those numbers. [...] >> >> Aaargh. I've arrived to the point where I have almost no functional pd on >> my box (with the exception of l2ork). >> vanilla says: "bash: /usr/bin/pd: No such file or directory" (i remember >> this is a known issue... for 64bit? can it be fixed by any chance?) >> extended (latest autobuild), and the fresh-built double keep on saying >> "watchdog: signaling pd..." >> What did I mess up? Will complete removals/reinstalls help? >> > > You can always 'apt-get install puredata' , you can even get 'puredata' > 0.43.0 for Ubuntu/Lucid from my PPA: > > https://launchpad.net/~**eighthave/+archive/pure-data<https://launchpad.net/%7Eeighthave/+archive/pure-data> > > Then you can get the pd-extended 0.42.5 release. As for nightlies and > other test builds, you can use dpkg -x to extract them anywhere, and them in > place. > > .hc >
OK, I've installed pd from your PPA, and the same story: watchdog signaling pd... My question is, what's this curse on my box? Or how can I make a tabula rasa so that a new install runs alrite? (Deleting .pdsettings doesn't solve this) Thanks for the patience.... Andras
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
