As it stands right now, there are new-lines in the middle of certain tcl commands sent from Pd, so if newline were it, I'd have to go chase down all the pretty-printing newlines in the Pd code and delete them. That might actually might work; I'd only be worried taht some extern was throwing up tcl code with intra-tcl-statement newlines that would occasionally throw false positives at the tcl completeness checker, if indeed all it did was check that the tcl buffer ended in a newline.
cheers Miller On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:45:09AM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > Le 2012-01-22 à 21:16:00, Miller Puckette a écrit : > > >There's not much way around this. One possibility (if indeed this > >is a serious efficiency issue) would be for Pd to append a "done" > >message to each batch up tcl to up-send. > > That's called a newline... not preceded by a backslash. The thing > with fconfigure -buffering line is that it doesn't care about > backslashes, whereas eval does, and if you use both together, you > need to account for that difference. > > ______________________________________________________________________ > | Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
