On Jan 30, 2012, at 6:36 PM, Martin Peach wrote:

> On 2012-01-30 17:45, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> 
>> The current pdstring format of lists of bytes seems to be working out pretty 
>> well.  I just had a thought, it would be nice to be able to write Unicode 
>> text out as UTF-8 files using [binfile].  I think currently it only accepts 
>> byte values of 0-255.  What if it converted values>  255 in the UTF-8 style? 
>>  Or should that be a separate [utf8file]?  I suppose the advantage of 
>> [utf8file] would be to make an easy conversion to [utf16file] and 
>> [utf32file].
>> 
> 
> [binfile] can work with any kind of file. It seems simpler to have filters 
> that could convert between lists of bytes and lists of utf character codes, 
> the way [slipenc] and [slipdec] will operate on any stream of bytes. Then 
> they wouldn't be tied to [binfile], and binfile wouldn't get all bloated with 
> obscure variations.
> Martin

That does make more sense, so something like [bytes2utf8], etc.

.hc

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Access to computers should be unlimited and total.  - the hacker ethic



_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to