Bugs item #3525616, was opened at 2012-05-10 13:08 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3525616&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: data-structure bug/ feature?? Initial Comment: Hello, (it's pd0.42.5 on windows) I tried to make some GUI-abstractions with the [struct]-stuff, and when looking at the parents savefile I noticed that the abstractions "drawings and stuff like that" are saved inside there as well... To be more prcise there is something added like: "#N struct ..." Now is it a bug or a feature (and why) ? I guess it's a bug since I used "$0" inside the [struct]. This is saved as eg. "#N struct 1004structname ..." (not ... \$0structname ..) into the master-patch. Now if I open several of these masterpatches at once and save "not the first one" the text in the savefile changes to eg. "#N struct 1007structname ...". But on loading as the first one again nothing complains to be wrong.. ...so is it just suberfluous?!? That's of course just a personal opinion, but I don't like the idea that "things" from inside an abstraction appear in the abstractions master-patch as well. Btw. what does the "#N" stand for?? Or in general why is there a "prefix" like "#N" or "#X" ?? thanks & bye ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3525616&group_id=55736 _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
