On Dec 9, 2012, at 1:19 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 12/09/2012 17:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >> >> Would it be possible to provide an alternative implementation for the same >> API as a built-in using this? So for example, an alternate Jack or ALSA >> implementation in a loadable module? >> > > (iirc) the current implementation allows us to overwrite/override a given > backend by simply registering another backend of the same name. > so es, you could provide a bug-fixed jack-implementation without touching the > pd-code. > > and of course, you could provide 3 different jack implementations (e.g. with > different features sets) at the same time, by just using different API-names.
This sounds excellent. I'd like to include this in Pd-extended 0.44. Did you have a chance to look at the issue I reported in this thread where portaudio doesn't work on OSX? .hc _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
