----- Original Message ----- > From: Thomas Mayer <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 8:18 PM > Subject: Re: [PD-dev] stackoverflow tag > > OK, so here is the question (and the tag): > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14226869/how-to-keep-audio-and-video-gem-synchronised
*Ping* And your first reply suggests asking back here on the list! *Pong* But I'd imagine Pd-related questions of a more general nature would benefit from being asked to a wider audience like that. -Jonathan > > On 08.01.2013 23:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >> Anyone on Stack Overflow with more than 1500 reputation? If so, please > create >> a "puredata" or "pd" tag, you need at least that many > points to be allowed to >> do so. >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/privileges/create-tags >> >> The question is, I guess, should the official tag be 'puredata' so > we can beat >> IBM to the punch, or 'pd'. I think 'puredata' is clearer. >> >> .hc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > > > -- > "We left all that stuff out. If there's an error, we have this > routine called panic, and when it is called, the machine crashes, > and you holler down the hall, 'Hey, reboot it.'" (Dennis Ritchie) > http://www.residuum.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
