If you build against Pd-extended, there might be some incompatibilities with vanilla. But if you build against vanilla, it should work fine in both.
.hc On 05/17/2013 05:04 AM, Orm Finnendahl wrote: > Hi devs, > > I run into a very strange problem with a binary external compiled for > osx. It seems the binary works fine on pd-extended 0.44-3 but not on > vanilla 0.44-3 (that has been tested on OSX 10.7 and up on different > machines). The external's same binary has been running without any > problems on extended and vanbilla since OSX 10.4. The external uses > statically linked gnu-libraries and considering the errors in the pd > window it seems the problem has something to do with them. > > Does anybody know the differences between vanilla and extended on OSX? > I realized that extended seems to use X11 while vanilla doesn't need > it, then I read something about full utf-8 support (this could have > some effect as the external dynamically creates and reads in patches) > and maybe there are different compiler settings. Maybe that gets me > somewhere... > > -- > Orm > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
