Actually, on second thought, why reinvent the wheel. It will be *alot* quicker to port James George's QTkit implementation from OpenFrameworks as opposed to coding with AVFoundation from scratch. Maybe that's the best bet all around. As Edison said: "Better is the enemy of good."
On Feb 23, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote: > Also, from what I've read, AVFoundation is the best bet for the long run. I > may start with AVFoundation plugins, then go QTkit if there is a need unless > there are overwhelming reasons to use QTKit over AVFoundation. I know one > issue is that QTKit handles more codecs and video formats, but I think the > writing is on the wall regarding the formats "blessed" by Apple since they > are are supporting fewer in AVFoundation mainly since those are supported in > hardware (aka better performance). > > On Feb 23, 2014, at 11:21 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> wrote: > >> what is missing are plugins for QtKit. -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
