Sure. I guess I don't know what I'm saying :D other than the question: what do we reasonably need? Does the current solution work or is the next step required?
On May 22, 2014, at 5:03 PM, [email protected] wrote: > To me, I think the ultimate use case is to be able to fire up two versions of > pd in the same processing chain (take vst's in a DAW for example), load each > one with identical patches, and have them controlled separately. This would > be a fantastic boost for the ability to extend what we can already do with Pd > as an audio processing engine, separated from its native GUI. Locking may be > necessary in places, but then that is extremely fast these days. > > Of course, this all leads to the pdinstance being able to manage the symbol > table along with Miller's recent changes, but what are the difficulties in > achieving this? It seems like Miller tried and it was more difficult than > what we are imagining. > > cheers, > Rich -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
