Well, [nbx] is itself a bug :) Anyway, I mean, fixes to new and old bugs anytime - except that, late in the game I'd like to avoid bug fixes that could possibly lead to more bugs. I don't know how to judge that except intuitively.
cheers Miller On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 08:13:25PM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > 2017-07-02 19:26 GMT-03:00 Miller Puckette <[email protected]>: > > > I'm just thinking about this. I think I want to "freeze" things July 14 > > (Bastille > > Day) or thereabouts, and make a "pd-0.48" branch then. (Heretofoore I've > > been making branches only if I wanted to go back and fix bugs, but I think > > its better practice to do that when ready to stop adding stuff). > > > > Let me see if I get it correctly, you mean stop with feature additions by > july 14th, and then have another 2 weeks of fixing bugs related to the > features added? Or do you mean stop with the new stuff but keep working on > bug fixes and other things? > > There are at least a couple of bug fixes that I really hope could happen > for 0.48 - one of which I was trying to fix with Matt Barber ([nbx] not > displaying 'nan' anymore). I ask all this just so I can plan for it. > > cheers > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
