Pd.app would be fine, yes. But, i think some flag should be added to distinguish 32 from 64 bit versions, like the current *-i386.app one, or simply Pd-32.app. This would be helpful when using Gem on OSX, for example.
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Nicolas Montgermont <[email protected]> wrote: > Pd.app is good for me. > Keeping old versions of vanilla is for advanced users/dev only that can > manage renaming the app bundle if they have a specific use of an older > version > n > > http://nimon.org > > Le 01/12/2017 à 14:11, Dan Wilcox a écrit : > > Bringing this up again as there is work towards a new (bug fix) release: > > On Nov 5, 2017, at 6:10 PM, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote: > > Howdy all, > > Now that the Pd mac app bundle is built with the version info included, we > could consider dropping the version name from the app bundle name and just > use "Pd.app" or "PureData.app". For comparison, Pd extended uses > "Pd-extended.app". The versions are differentiated by the OS using the info > in the app's plist automatically and users can see the version info in > Finder's Get Info dialog. > > The only downside is users who have multiple versions of vanilla on their > systems will need to manually rename the app bundle if they want to keep > these versions together in the /Applications folder. > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > > > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing > [email protected]https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > > -- http://fdch.github.io/tv
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
