2017-12-02 19:18 GMT-02:00 Miller Puckette <[email protected]>: > I believe it's up on github. I think you 'pull' it and then > 'git checkout 0.48-1'. >
Ahá! Found it https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/tree/0.48-1 > > cheers > Miller > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:52:52PM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > hi, where can we check your new 0.48-1 branch? > > > > cheers > > > > 2017-12-02 17:40 GMT-02:00 Miller Puckette <[email protected]>: > > > > > OK, I ended up pushing to a new branch (just to stay on the safe side > for > > > now). > > > Assuming all looks OK I can make this the main branch. > > > > > > I had one small ouch: I don't think I can compatibly change t_int to > int > > > in m_pd.h (this is mentioned on another thread somewhere). I don't > know > > > how > > > to make clang pipe down about this short of casting almost every call > to > > > atom_getint*() in the whole tree. Yuck... Maybe it's better just to > tell > > > clang to be more permissive (if that's possible)? > > > > > > Meanwhile, I think PRs are starting to appear on top of the existing > PRs... > > > and/or they're growing since I tried to merge them. I don't know how > to > > > get github to think of the PRs as against the 0.48-1 branch, so my > thought > > > for the moment is to wait until it looks save to merge 0.48-1 into > master > > > and > > > then try merging whatever PRs might have changed. > > > > > > In case some PR in fact hasn't been added to since I made all the > merges, I > > > think it will look like it has been merged once I merge the 0.48-1 > branch > > > into master. So at that point it should be easier to figure out which > PRs > > > need to be re-merged. > > > > > > cheers > > > Miller > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:39:52PM +0100, Dan Wilcox wrote: > > > > Sounds good. Let me know if I can help, ie. merge some of the various > > > PRs into a single PR. > > > > > > > > > On Nov 30, 2017, at 12:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I put this right in 'head' on a clone of my own repo; it compiles > OK > > > for me > > > > > here on linux/64 and widows-32 so I think it's provisionally > working, > > > but needs > > > > > lots of testing. > > > > > > > > > > If there's no reason not to I'll just throw that all in my own > 'head' > > > and push > > > > > it all back to the git repo. > > > > > > > > -------- > > > > Dan Wilcox > > > > @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> > > > > danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> > > > > robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Pd-dev mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Pd-dev mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pd-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
