After more investigation, the bounds of the patch (in fact the bounds of the GOP) include the border size (the thin red/black line) but the IEM's GUIs don't include their border. I have to increase their sizes by 1 (assuming that the border size is 1, I should have increased the size by 2 * border size but it works with 1). I've pull the last Pd version (0.48.1) into libPd but I think the same offset was the same with Pd-0.48.0. Cheers
2017-12-06 15:04 GMT+01:00 Pierre Guillot <[email protected]>: > With libPd, calling the getrect function of the IEM's GUIs gives > coordinates that seem to be slightly different from what is really drawn. > I've seen in the Github PR 227 (https://github.com/pure-data/ > pure-data/pull/227), that the IEM's GUIs have been updated. Do the size > and the position of the objects has changed? The Pd submodule of libPd is > behind Pd vanilla, so in this case I should wait before trying to correct > these small offsets in my code. If changes has been made, does it respect > now the Purr-Data "expectations" (see https://git.purrdata.net/ > jwilkes/purr-data/issues/243#note_1995)? > > Cheers (an thanks for the work!) > Pierre >
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
