On 2018-06-24 21:08, Miller Puckette wrote: > Cool.... that just saved me hours of work going through PRs one by one :)
great to be of help. please note, that there are a number of PRs that are *not* included, (e.g. the PD_LONGINTTYPE patch [7]). my rule of thumb for including patches in the PR is that they must be no-brainers: #1 only bugfixes #2 the patch is trivial #3 the patch is "unanimous" (no protests, "buts" or second thoughts have been (ever) voiced) i haven't included the PD_LONGINTTYPE patch because of #3 (see †). i haven't included some of the help-patch updates because of #2 (as Pd-patches are really a pain to compare). i try my best to live up to my own rules, but as a human this is not always easy. gfmasdr IOhannes [7] https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/7 † https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/7#issuecomment-216948587
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
