I hope to get the intelligent patching features in - but not sure about the pointer-invalid problem; I've been thinking for years about how to do that and haven't liked any of the solutions I've seen yet.
cheers Miller On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 02:52:37AM +0000, Henri Augusto Bisognini wrote: > Hi! Since we got on the subject of 0.49 do you guys mind if i ask a couple > questions about what's planned? Just out of curiosity and excitement : ) > > -I see there's a PR (#383) that adds a delete method for [pointer]. There's > any forecast for that feature? I've been waiting that one heh > > -Also will 0.49 come with the intelligent patching features IOhannes been > working on? That will be a dream come true. > > Cheers > Henri. > > > ________________________________ > De: Pd-dev <[email protected]> em nome de Miller Puckette > <[email protected]> > Enviado: s?bado, 1 de setembro de 2018 21:28 > Para: Christof Ressi > Cc: pd-dev > Assunto: Re: [PD-dev] roadmap for Pd-0.49? > > Looking back I've only been able to get out a bit fewer than one major > release per year... I hope to speed this up now that there are much better > scripts and tools in place (thanks mostly to other people!) > > My own situation is that I go into heavy teaching mode again Sept. 24 so > I'll either succeed and get out 0.49 before then or fail and only get it out > late December. If I do get 0.49 working quickly I'll then aim for 0.50 in > February or March. > > For 0.49 I want to fix the escaping of '\' characters (I had earlier tried > to make it possible simply never to make a `\` character visible to the > user but this has turned out to be impossible). Also I want to fix pasting > to place objects under the mouse (or at the very least, somewhere visible, > not off the edge of the window) > > For the medium term I'm thinking about revisiting array drawing to make it > more efficient and controllable, and expanding the capabilities of the 'atom' > box (lists; texts). > > Also I have a vague plan to make an API feature to guide DSP graph sorting > order, e.g., to request that one item in a patch be sorted in advance of > another without them being connected by a patch cord. > > Anyway, I think whatever happens to 0.49 I can deal with feature PRs anytime > this fall and get them into a release by late winter. > > cheers > Miller > > On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 12:32:47AM +0200, Christof Ressi wrote: > > Hi Miller, > > > > I just wanted to ask what's your approximate roadmap for Pd 0.49? Do I need > > to hurry up if I want to propose stuff or is there plenty of time left? :-) > > > > Christof > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
