What I was implying, then, is that if [savestate] brings this kind of functionality, albeit tangentially, then why not include specific [initbang] and [closebang] objects as well? That would solve a longstanding feature request without kludging the [savestate] mechanism which may/or may not change.
> On Sep 8, 2018, at 12:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 22:04:14 +0200 > From: IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PD-dev] savestate > Message-ID: <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On 9/3/18 3:35 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote: >> Also, does the right outlet effectively act as a "save bang"? This might be >> tangentially useful for some data structure abstractions... > > what i find even more exiting, is that the left outlet effectively acts > as an "init bang", finally allowing you to create abstractions with a > dynamic number of iolets in Pd-vanilla (in a way that survives saving > both the abstraction and its containing patch). > > gfmard > IOhannes -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
