Hi Dan -

I'm hoping to get 0.49 out over the weekend, certainly by Thursday AM when
I start teaching with it - selfish I suppose, but I have a whole library
using eh savestate feature, and I'm really tired of students opening the
same patch 3 times and getting confused, and the deep undo feature is way
way overdue.

Are any of the portaudio/portmidi changes urgent, or can they wait for a
0.49-1 or even a 0.50 release (former case, in 2 or 3 weeks as a bug-fixer;
latter case, January or February) ?

cheers
Miller

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 04:35:50PM +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> I will try to update Pd's included copy of portaudio and portmidi. I know 
> from another project that the portaudio device string handling has been 
> improved (on macOS at least) and longer names are no longer truncated.
> 
> One issue with doing this is I've made some changes to both libs in order to 
> fix things we've found in Pd. These have been forwarded upstream but I'm not 
> sure if they are in any of the newer stable releases. My plan is pull out of 
> these that we still need into separate patch files and either write a script 
> for updating both libs and/or simple instructions on updating and applying 
> any patches. This way we don't have to worry about losing any hard-won fixes 
> while still being able to upgrade with new Pd releases. This approach is 
> similar to that I've taken with applying the key fixes to TK 8.5.19 for the 
> mac app build.
> 
> I'll try to get to this in the next few days.
> 
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> 
> 
> 

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev




_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to