On 30.06.19 22:24, Miller Puckette wrote: >>> But I don't think it's a good idea to put latex compilation in the Pd >>> compile chain, >> why? >> > ATM I can (and do) compile Pd using only "make", "cc" and "ln" - trying to > keep the dependencies to an absolute minimum. >
hence my suggestion to make the building of the documentation optional. however, it nevertheless needs to be built at least once, and if you want to keep your *release workflow* to tools like "ln" (and "cp" and "mkdir" :-)), the documentation artifacts probably have to be kept in the repository. in any case, i'd like to be able to create a bit-by-bit identical documentation using automated tools from the doc's source-code. fgmasdr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
