Em qua, 31 de jul de 2019 às 08:46, matthew brandi <[email protected]> escreveu:
> On 31/07/2019 09:31, Tsz Kiu Pang wrote: > > Alexandre has recently requested a new object/functionality similar > > to max's [if] … I am just wondering whether my approach (adding a > > new class to the [expr], [expr~], [fexpr~] mix) is correct, and > > whether this functionality is something that we need. I will > > probably put in a pull request soon if there is no objection > > > Dear TK and Alexandre > > I have no objection, but I do have a couple of naïve questions: > > [a] In the message case, I am struggling to see the point > yup, the point is convenience, and I'd say part of the convenience is that all the ground is already laid out. In fact, my firs suggestion was to add a new "ifthen" function to the expr family, but got an objection that closed the request https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/662 > [b] If a parallel audio case is envisaged, what would it do? > there'd no [if~] object
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
