correction: I forgot that Roman's netpd uses iemnet, not netsend/netreceive, which I guess is why his jack~ implementation is working better than mine. I can switch over as well, so I don't have any urgent need to send replies from netreceive -u to netsend -u as I had thought.
It would still be good if the new netsend/receive were able to do this, both to maintain 0.50 compatibility, and to allow vanilla-only access to that ability. The 0.50 version actually didn't do it particularly well - datagrams were limited to 1000 bytes, which was stupid of me. It still got used by others I think. thanks again... Miller On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 08:45:16PM -0700, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev wrote: > To Pd dev (of interest to netsend/netreceive experts :) - > > One thing that was possible in pd 0.50 was to "send" to netreceive -u ... this > was added by Shahrokh Yadegari a year or so ago. I think it gets used; for > instance I don't see how to implement jacktrip without it (as Roman > Haefeli did in his netpd system and as I'm now trying to do in a Camomile > plugin). > > Would it be onerous to bring that capability back? For the moment we can > fall back to 0.50 but we'd need a way to do this, even if it's impossible to > do exactly compatibly with 0.50. > > thanks > Miller > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
