On 1/25/23 17:09, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev wrote:
I think I hadn't pushed them, oops. And now I'm thinking again - maybe it's more elegant yet to provide empty output signals (channels=length=vec=0)
conceptually, i like this; though i would suggest "channels=0; length=64" (or whatever).
and instead of (for example)
sp[2] = signal_swapforchans(sp[2], outchans);
you'd just write
signal_setchans(sp[2], ouchans).
hmm, wouldn't that modify the t_signal* struct that sp[2] points to, potentially breaking the reuse? (so it ought to be "signal_setchans(&sp[2], outchans)")
and i find the "swapforchans" slightly confusing (which fo(u)r channels are being swapped? the actual swapping is done by re-assigning a new value to sp[2]).
so how about: sp[2] = signal_makemultichannels(sp[2], outchans); gfmasdr IOhannes
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
