Getting back here after a while, just to confirm that Christof was
right. I would like to clarify if the following chunk is necessary to be
placed in the dsp routine:
```
t_sample **dummy = x->in;
for (i = 0; i < x->inchnls; i++)
*dummy++ = sp[i]->s_vec;
dummy = x->out;
for (i = x->inchnls; i < x->inchnls+x->outchnls; i++)
*dummy++ = sp[i]->s_vec;
```
Without this the object crashes. From what I understand, the sp pointer
contains the input and output samples, together with the block size,
right? So, it's necessary to write the input and output to the pointer
of pointers for the inlets and outlets.
Anyway, thanks for the help.
Alexandros
On 9/23/23 11:39, Christof Ressi wrote:
So you're saying that I only need to do the initial allocation, like
this:
`x->x_in = (t_sample **)getbytes(ninlets * sizeof(t_sample *));`
and not try to allocate `t_sample *` bytes in the for loop? I did try
this, but again the object is crushing.
Yes, because "x_in" and "x_out" are supposed to hold the signal
vectors ("s_vecf") of the inlets and outlets, which you would assign
in the "dsp" method.
Christof
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
