Hmm.. I just made one of those too... maybe we should compare notes
offline and combine
the best features of both. I'll send you the think I did offline...
cheers
Miller
On 5/19/25 7:13 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Em dom., 18 de mai. de 2025 às 10:17, Christof Ressi
<i...@christofressi.com> escreveu:
if you announce this "merge window" in advance, we can
give you a list of prioritized PRs and also make sure they are in
good
shape.
While we're on the merging season, I got a new abstraction I'm
suggesting to add to 'extra' and I'd like others to check it out and
test if they are happy with it ;)
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2574
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2574__;!!Mih3wA!GLBDbDHfdy-Hx8zQUV_w5UeCWt1oiU4Uxb_5PclPJ9Ef0-ZsoN0rHejbfjMl3k78tu8yFrr99Q$>
it's a simple abstraction to calculate biquad coefficients to be a
nice companion to [biquad~] for 9 typical filters. It's
thoroughly tested and the math/object just works. You can confirm that
but I'd like a check if you're all happy with the design or have any
other suggestions or feedback. Luckily we'll be able to check if this
is in good shape to be considered for 0.56 ;)
Thanks.
ps. I see I have a lot of work to do now in the doc branch with all
the exciting newly merged features :) hang on and I'll get there.
ps2. Let me also have my check of PRs that are already in good shape
for consideration for now in a next message.
---
pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/TAM6VD27IZJ53KZDITN7IZJZNAMKRATR/__;!!Mih3wA!GLBDbDHfdy-Hx8zQUV_w5UeCWt1oiU4Uxb_5PclPJ9Ef0-ZsoN0rHejbfjMl3k78tu-oLs8H8g$
---
pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist
https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/QQOBL67YHQSWGNODP73IQ6RWLGDFHMCW/
