Frank Barknecht wrote:
...
thanks for the many tipps!
> In the long run you could save quite some CPU cycles by using the more
> traditional clock-based sequencing where possible.
in the past (reaktor) i have used the songposition most of the time, and
made everything counter-based. (always perfectly in sync,
but harder to manually re-sync).
since i was happy that my first pd patch (a 'rockafella'-based
loop-player) was running pretty well (and in sync) with this
pahsor based approach, i continued to use this method. i agree that it
is a waste of cpu. maybe id would be a good idea to use only one phasor
(or a vline based 'phasor') to drive a counter and than use this
counter for the different sequencers. at least when it is not
neccessary to sync the different modules independently.
(groovebox2...)
bis denn!
martin
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
