On Dec 6, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Jamie Bullock wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 11:14 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
FYI, I just enabled the building of [plugin~] on Mac OS X. So it
should be included in nightly builds and upcoming test and final
releases.
Any chance of getting [dssi~] included in this? It has an additional
dependency on the liblo library, but it builds and works fine on both
linux and Mac OS (powerpc and intel).
The advantages of [dssi~] over [plugin~] are
1. It supports DSSI plugins as well as LADSPA
2. It can host multiple plugin instances within a single [dssi~]
instance e.g. [dssi~ sine_faaa 20] for 20 sine oscillators.
It doesn't do VST but other than that the functionality of plugin~
is a
subset of the functionality of dssi~.
Sure, if you do the work. I think the issue was that the DSSI code
would have to be maintained in the pure-data CVS, which some people
strongly protested. DSSI isn't in Fink. In order for it to be
supported in the auto-builds and Pd-extended packages on Mac OS X,
the code either needs to be in CVS or Fink, or included in the OS.
You could just make a libdir package, then people could use DSSI with
plain pd too (with the libdir external).
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking at things from a more basic level, you can come up with a
more direct solution... It may sound small in theory, but it in
practice, it can change entire economies. - Amy Smith
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
