Mathieu Bouchard a écrit :
Seriously, it's not really a problem to have any amount of latency
(even one million year) when there is a single musician.
If the musician can concentrate on the fingers rather than what is
heard, fine (but that needs to be a good player).
The musician don't have to concentrate on what is heard at all, at the
moment he is able to hear what he is playing, but the problem he could
meet would be about having a mix of his sound and the delayed sound.
However I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about a player trying
to fit in a group, hopefully with one central sound output or at least
sound outputs that are close to each other. The player has to keep
always the same advance; he/she heard the previous notes from other
player and needs to play something that will fit with what will be
heard from those people at the time in the future when it'll be played.
That is exactely what I am saying and what involves composition or style
problems.
The composer could compute himself the latency between each musician and
beetween instruments groups, or between an orchestra and the director,
or between the whole thing and the public, even between different
listening points in the public.
Patco.
___________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire.
http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
