On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 14:08 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> > i can't quite follow, what you mean hear. you CAN use [wrap~] to build
> > your own [int~] (see attached patch).
>
> Well, the problem is, that this will give you "-1" if you apply it to
> [sig~ 0], whereas int(0) is 0 as is the equivalent message algorithm
> using [wrap] (see attached again).
ah, i see. thank you for making this clear. obviously i cannot count to
1 ;-).
> >> sig~ 0
> >> wrap~
> >> print~
> >> -> 1
> >
> > as i would expect, as well. where is the bug? am i missing
something?
of course, this looks also strange in my eyes. i was not reading
carefully.
roman
___________________________________________________________
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail:
http://mail.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
