Hi Bryan,
i think it would be a good idea to define FLEXT_USE_CMEM in the flext
build system by default.
Currently pd doesn't use anything different than C memory allocation
(in getbytes, freebytes) so there's no real reason to not to.
Concerning your fluid problems i can't really help, since i don't use
it, but i'm sure there are some experts who can.
all the best,
Thomas
Am 28.01.2007 um 17:17 schrieb Bryan Jurish:
morning all,
I've been chasing a bug for several weeks now that I just can't
seem to
get my head around: symptoms are segfaults and complete crashes in pd
(v0.40-2 vanilla) on linux/x86 [debian unstable, gcc 4.1.2]. gdb
backtraces are available, and I've just recompiled using identical
CFLAGS everywhere (-O3 -march=pentium-m -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse
-ffast-math -funroll-loops), since I had feared that -malign-double
might have been biting me, but this doesn't appear to have been the
case...
Buglet the First (solved, kinda)
=======================================
- description: [pool] and [readanysf~] don't play nicely together
- symptom: the (infamous) libc message on stderr when closing a patch:
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x0823e46c ***
+ apparently caused by some goofiness with the flext delete()
operator
(backtraces etc. available)
- solution (I think, thanks to the list archives):
+ compile both flext and readanysf~ with -DFLEXT_USE_CMEM
+ readanysf~ really seems to need FLEXT_USE_CMEM flext-globally
(I can
provide a pretty complete and systematic list of the configurations
I've
tried: it's possible to compile and run successfully without
FLEXT_USE_CMEM, but things break more or less randomly at runtime
then:
particularly, the "stop" message to readanysf~ segfaults pd)
- solution (I think, thanks to the list archives):
+ this seems to work for [pool] and [readanysf~], but...
Buglet the Second (please assist!)
=======================================
- description: [fluid~] in abstractions crashes pd
+ having compiled flext with -DFLEXT_USE_CMEM, loading any
abstraction
containing a [fluid~] object causes pd to segfault (see below)
+ bug occurs even without any other externals loaded
+ oddly, I *can* create [fluid~]s by hand, (but not load them in
an abstraction, which makes the object pretty useless, im(ns)ho)
+ any ideas why fluid_init() is trying to initialize this==NULL ?
- this appears to be FLEXT_USE_CMEM related, since I didn't get
these symptoms without FLEXT_USE_CMEM in flext itself
+ I can't just -UFLEXT_USE_CMEM for fluid~, because:
(a) that would break readanysf~ if I did it flext-globally, and
(b) if I undefine FLEXT_USE_CMEM only for fluid~, I get undefined
linker symbols at runtime:
/usr/local/lib/pd/extra/fluid~.pd_linux: \
/usr/local/lib/pd/extra/fluid~.pd_linux: undefined symbol: \
_ZN19flext_root_single_ddlEPv \
fluid~: can't load library
+ would it help to fork the flext build procedure (again!),
basically adding another library suffix for FLEXT_USE_CMEM,
since its effects appear not to be restricted to the headers?
- if the suffix were, say, 'c', where we now have:
libflext-pd((_d)?.so|_[st]d?.a)
we would get:
libflext-pd((_c?d?).so|_[st]c?d?.a)
- i know this is ugly, and I'm not even sure it would work,
but I'm at my wits' end here... I hope somebody can shed
some light on this for me...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1210693952 (LWP 24068)]
0xb7dcb589 in free () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
(gdb) backtrace
#0 0xb7dcb589 in free () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#1 0xb7d1e639 in delete_fluid_synth () from /usr/lib/
libfluidsynth.so.1
#2 0x08237bd0 in ?? ()
#3 0x0811ace0 in mstack.5434 ()
#4 0xbfd76828 in ?? ()
#5 0xb7d47366 in fluid::fluid_init (this=0x0, argc=-1210746848,
argv=0xb7caf730)
at fluid/main.cpp:251
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
marmosets,
Bryan
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
Thomas Grill
http://grrrr.org
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list