On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 23:37 +0100, Thomas Grill wrote: > > Is Flext based externals, which need be GPL externals, violating the > > GPL when used as Max/MSP externals? If so, and if the GPL is not > > violated when using the Flext based externals with Pd, then it makes > > sense in my head to distinguish between binary and source wrt > > violation against the GPL. But Flext might have a clause that catches > > just that? > > > To my mind, flext-based Max externals would only violate the GPL, if > they were shipped closed-source with Max. > If the are GPL'd as well and installed by the user, i don't see why this > should be a problem.
although i don't really like this clause, the following description is quite clear: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLPluginsInNF tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 96771783 http://tim.klingt.org There's no such entity as "most people". These are generalities. All generalities are meaningless. You've got to pin it down to a specific person doing a specific thing at a specific time and space. William S. Burroughs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list