Hi all, gpointers are used (de facto) to store pointers by many externals and library. Would it be more stable to provide a standard data type for pointers like gemchains, #grids and such ? I doubt, but it would be more consistent.
BTW Chris, you can also use iem_anything to store and repeat *gem lists. Cheers, a 2007/3/6, Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:00:37PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > Hallo, > > Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote: > > > > > OK... looks like [list append] does deal with pointers almost correctly > > > (I forgot I had done that), but there is a bug when you send a new > > > list to its inlet re-entrantly. I'll fix this for 0.41 but in the > > > meantime you can work around it by forcing a copy of the outgoing > > > message (send a list to "t b l" connected to the two inlets of "list > > > append" > > > to make a copy of the list)... > > > > Ah, this seems to work. I still get "consistency check failed: > > gpointer_copy" messages however using Pd from current CVS. But it's > > nice to see this in action generally. > > Shot in the dark; so does this mean we can store GEM pointers in > lists too? That would be neat because then you could make a non-zexy > abstraction-only [repeat] object. > > Best, > > Chris. > > ------------------- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mccormick.cx > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > -- Alexandre Quessy http://alexandre.quessy.net _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list