Hi there, I am not so terribly into that right now..
Just an idea. What if you just shift the table and write it to a second one... silly probably... just an idea Am 07.05.2007 um 20:25 schrieb Derek Holzer: > Sorry! Should read: > > Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the > offset to 95 and the length to 30, I would like to get a loop that > starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25. > The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through > 0 to > 25, und so weiter. > > apologies, > d. > > Derek Holzer wrote: >> Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the >> offset to 95 and the length to 25, I would like to get a loop that >> starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25. >> The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through >> 0 to >> 25, und so weiter. >> >> best, >> d. >> >> Frank Barknecht wrote: >> >>> Ah, sorry: I now read, that you don't want to start at the beginning >>> of the sample but at the offset-point again. Then some more math is >>> needed, I'll give it a shot a bit later. >> > > -- > derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl > ---Oblique Strategy # 175: > "What are the sections sections of? Imagine a caterpillar moving" > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list