Roman Haefeli wrote: > hi tim again > > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 17:37 +0200, Tim Boykett wrote: >> Hi Roman, >> >> Okay, I had contemplated this and though that it must be possible >> to do this easier. But No! This seems somehow like a hack,
why does it seem like a hack to you? if you want to create an avi of your car, you have to use a video-camera. if you want to create an avi of (vector) graphics, you have to render them into pixel space. i don't think that either of these is a hack; it is just how things are done. > > hack or not, i think there is no other way, unless there are plans for > something like a [pix_text]. > definitely not. if you don't want to do graphics but video instead, you are problably better off with pdp.... (this is not meant as an insult on you or pdp; it is just that pdp (apart from 3dp) is video/pixel oriented instead of graphic-oriented; yves has done a [pdp_text]) however, "exporting" to different formats should be made simpler in Gem... mfg.adr IOhanens _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list